Can you prove a human reviewed that AI recommendation?
Log human oversight decisions. Meet EU AI Act Article 14. Pass your next audit.
Ad-hoc governance doesn't scale
The EU AI Act requires documented human oversight for high-risk AI
Your team reviews AI outputs informally but there's no paper trail
Auditors will ask 'how do you ensure human oversight?' and you need evidence
Automation bias is real - you need proof that humans can and do override AI
How Review works
Define review points
Set up where human review is required in your AI workflows
Log decisions
Simple interface for recording reviews, approvals, and overrides
Export for compliance
Audit trail with timestamps, users, and reasoning - ready for regulators
Key Benefits
Consistent process
Every AI tool goes through the same structured evaluation.
Clear policies
Define approval criteria that anyone can understand and follow.
Audit trail
Complete documentation of every decision for compliance purposes.
Multi-stakeholder review
Route reviews to IT, security, legal, and business owners as needed.
Automated triage
Low-risk tools can be auto-approved based on policy rules.
Exception handling
Clear process for urgent or exceptional cases.
Who Uses This
Standardizing AI tool approval
Documenting AI governance for regulators
Getting AI tools approved quickly
From chaos to process
Most organizations have no formal process for AI tool adoption. Someone in marketing discovers a new tool. They sign up. They start using it. IT finds out months later.
This creates inconsistency, risk, and compliance gaps. EU AI Act requires documented governance. Ad-hoc approaches don’t qualify.
Structured review workflows
Armadillo Review provides a framework for consistent AI governance:
Policy Definition Define clear criteria for AI tool approval:
- Required security certifications
- Data handling requirements
- Compliance standards
- Cost thresholds
- Business justification requirements
Triage Rules Not every tool needs full review. Configure rules to:
- Auto-approve low-risk, common tools
- Fast-track tools already approved for other teams
- Require full review for high-risk categories
Multi-Stakeholder Review Route reviews to the right people:
- IT Security for security assessment
- Legal for contract and compliance review
- Finance for cost approval
- Business owner for business case validation
Decision Documentation Every decision is recorded:
- Who requested the tool and why
- Who reviewed and when
- What concerns were raised
- Why it was approved or rejected
- Any conditions or restrictions
Audit-ready documentation
When regulators ask about your AI governance:
- Complete inventory: Every tool, approved or not
- Decision history: Full trail of every review
- Policy documentation: Clear criteria and processes
- Exception records: How edge cases were handled
This documentation meets EU AI Act requirements for AI governance.
User-friendly process
Good governance shouldn’t block productivity. Review is designed to be fast:
- Clear timelines: Users know when to expect decisions
- Transparent status: Real-time visibility into review progress
- Escalation paths: Clear process for urgent needs
- Appeal process: Fair handling of rejections
The goal is governance that enables safe AI adoption, not governance that blocks progress.